<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Radio Control Hobby Talks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rctalks.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rctalks.com</link>
	<description>Everything R/C Hobbies Forums News Reviews Images Videos Shop &#38; Flight Simulator Downloads</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 22:18:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Parkzone F-27Q Stryker Review</title>
		<link>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/26/parkzone-f-27q-stryker-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/26/parkzone-f-27q-stryker-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 22:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RC Airplanes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rcairplanereviews.com/pzreviews/171-parkzonef27qstrykerreview.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intro


A few years back I decided I had the need for
speed. Still being somewhat of a ‘noob’ I did some research and found that if I
wanted to go fast I should buy the Parkzone Stryker. I looked online and found
someone that was selling a hi...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none">Intro</p>


<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none">A few years back I decided I had the need for
speed. Still being somewhat of a ‘noob’ I did some research and found that if I
wanted to go fast I should buy the Parkzone Stryker. I looked online and found
someone that was selling a highly modified Stryker near my house. I met the guy
and <img src="http://www.rctalks.com/radiocontrol/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/parkzone-f-27q-stryker-review.jpg" mce_src="http://www.rctalks.com/radiocontrol/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/parkzone-f-27q-stryker-review.jpg" style="float: right;" mce_style="float: right;" height="133" width="200">although the Stryker was bright orange and beat up, I bought it. The
airplane was a beast that definitely topped 100mph at full throttle but the
motor and battery would come down blazing hot after each flight. It served me
well for several months before I pulled a ‘watch this’ maneuver and ran it full
blast into a tree. The resulting carnage was spectacular. Over time I rebuilt
the Stryker but it was never the same and Shaky Thumbs has constantly bugged me
about getting a new one. </p>


<p class="MsoNormal" style="" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none">When I saw that Parkzone was re-releasing the
Stryker I was only mildly intrigued since I still had one on the shelf. A month
ago I managed to burn up my Stryker’s motor while testing a questionable ESC and
watched in dismay as hot embers jumped from the motor can like fleas off of a
dog. Suddenly I was in the market for a new Stryker! Last weekend I went to the RC Hobbies and bought the new F-27Q Stryker to see what all the fuss was about.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none"></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/26/parkzone-f-27q-stryker-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Airfield F6F Hellcat Review</title>
		<link>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/25/airfield-f6f-hellcat-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/25/airfield-f6f-hellcat-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 22:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RC Airplanes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rcairplanereviews.com/rc-airplane-reviews/179-airfieldhellcatreview.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[History


The Grumman F6F Hellcat
was a carrier-based fighter aircraft developed to replace the earlier F4F
Wildcat in United States Navy (USN) service. Although the F6F resembled the
Wildcat, it was a completely new design powered by a 2,000 hp ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none">History</p>


<p class="MsoNormal" style="" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none">The Grumman F6F Hellcat
was a carrier-based fighter aircraft developed to replace the earlier F4F
Wildcat in United States Navy (USN) service. Although the F6F resembled the
Wildcat, it was a completely new design powered by a 2,000 hp Pratt &
Whitney R-2800. Some tagged it as the "Wildcat's big brother". The
Hellcat and the Vought F4U Corsair were the primary USN fighters during the
second half of World War II.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none"><img src="http://www.rctalks.com/radiocontrol/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/airfield-f6f-hellcat-review.jpg" mce_src="http://www.rctalks.com/radiocontrol/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/airfield-f6f-hellcat-review.jpg" style="float: right;" mce_style="float: right;" height="133" width="200"><br /></p>


<p class="MsoNormal" style="" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none">The Hellcat was the
first USN fighter designed in view of lessons from combat with the Japanese
Zero. The Hellcat was credited with destroying 5,271 aircraft while in service
with the U.S. Navy and U.S. Marine Corps (5,163 in the Pacific and eight more
during the invasion of Southern France, plus 52 with the Royal Navy's Fleet Air
Arm during World War II), which was more than any other U.S. naval aircraft.
Postwar, the Hellcat was phased out of front line service, but remained in
service as late as 1954 as a night fighter. The Hellcat holds a crew of one and
is powered by a 2,000 hp Pratt & Whitney R-2800-10W "Double Wasp"
two-row radial engine. The more powerful engine gave the Hellcat a top speed of
380 mph and a service ceiling of 37,300 ft.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none"></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/25/airfield-f6f-hellcat-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dynam Spitfire Review</title>
		<link>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/24/dynam-spitfire-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/24/dynam-spitfire-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 23:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RC Airplanes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rcairplanereviews.com/rc-airplane-reviews/173-dynamspitfire.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[History


The Supermarine Spitfire is a British single-seat
fighter aircraft which was used by the Royal Air Force and many other Allied
countries throughout the Second World War. The Spitfire continued to be used as
a front line fighter and in s...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none">History</p>


<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none">The Supermarine Spitfire is a British single-seat
fighter aircraft which was used by the Royal Air Force and many other Allied
countries throughout the Second World War. The Spitfire continued to be used as
a front line fighter and in secondary roles into the 1950s. It was produced in
greater numbers than any other British aircraft, and was the only British
fighter in production throughout the war.</p>


<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none">The Spitfire was designed as a short-range,
high-performance interceptor aircraft by R. J. Mitchell, chief designer at
Supermarine Aviation Works. Mitchell continued to refine the design until his
death from cancer in 1937, whereupon his colleague Joseph Smith became chief
designer. The Spitfire's elliptical wing had a thin cross-section, allowing a
higher top speed than several contemporary fighters, including the Hawker
Hurricane. Speed was seen as essential to carry out the mission of home defense
against enemy bombers.<img src="http://www.rctalks.com/radiocontrol/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/dynam-spitfire-review.jpg" mce_src="http://www.rctalks.com/radiocontrol/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/dynam-spitfire-review.jpg" style="float: right;" mce_style="float: right;" height="144" width="200"></p>


<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none">During the Battle of Britain, the Spitfire was
perceived by the public as the RAF fighter of the battle, whereas in fact, the
more numerous Hurricane actually shouldered a greater proportion of the burden
against the Luftwaffe. The Spitfire units did, however, have a lower attrition
rate and a higher victory to loss ratio than those flying Hurricanes.</p>


<p class="MsoNormal" style="">After the Battle of Britain, the Spitfire became
the backbone of RAF Fighter Command, and saw action in the European,
Mediterranean, Pacific and the South-East Asian theatres. Much loved by its
pilots, the Spitfire served in several roles, including interceptor, photo-reconnaissance,
fighter-bomber, carrier-based fighter, and trainer. It was built in many
variants, using several wing configurations. Although the original airframe was
designed to be powered by a Rolls-Royce Merlin engine producing 1,030 hp (768
kW), it was adaptable enough to use increasingly more powerful Merlin and the
later Rolls-Royce Griffon engines; the latter was eventually able to produce
2,035 hp (1,520]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/24/dynam-spitfire-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Airfield A6M Zero Review</title>
		<link>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/23/airfield-a6m-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/23/airfield-a6m-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 23:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RC Airplanes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rcairplanereviews.com/rc-airplane-reviews/177-airfieldzeroreview.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[History


The Mitsubishi A6M Zero
was a long range fighter aircraft operated by the Imperial Japanese Navy Air
Service (IJNAS) from 1940 to 1945. The A6M was designated as the Mitsubishi
Navy Type 0 Carrier Fighter, and also designated as the Mit...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none">History</p>


<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none">The Mitsubishi A6M Zero
was a long range fighter aircraft operated by the Imperial Japanese Navy Air
Service (IJNAS) from 1940 to 1945. The A6M was designated as the Mitsubishi
Navy Type 0 Carrier Fighter, and also designated as the Mitsubishi A6M Rei-sen and
Mitsubishi Navy 12-shi Carrier Fighter. The A6M was usually referred to by the
Allies as the "Zero", from the 'Navy Type 0 Carrier Fighter'
designation. The official Allied reporting name was Zeke.<img src="http://www.rctalks.com/radiocontrol/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/airfield-a6m-zero-review.jpg" mce_src="http://www.rctalks.com/radiocontrol/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/airfield-a6m-zero-review.jpg" style="float: right;" mce_style="float: right;" height="133" width="200"></p>


<p class="MsoNormal" style="" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none">When it was introduced
early in World War II, the Zero was the best carrier-based fighter in the
world, combining excellent maneuverability and very long range. In early combat
operations, the Zero gained a legendary reputation as a "dogfighter",
achieving the outstanding kill ratio of 12 to 1, but by mid-1942 a combination
of new tactics and the introduction of better equipment enabled the Allied
pilots to engage the Zero on more equal terms. The IJNAS also frequently used
the type as a land-based fighter. By 1943, inherent design weaknesses and the
increasing lack of more powerful aircraft engines meant that the Zero became
less effective against newer enemy fighters that possessed greater firepower,
armor, and speed, and approached the Zero's maneuverability. Although the
Mitsubishi A6M was outdated by 1944, it was never totally supplanted by the
newer Japanese aircraft types. During the final years of the War in the
Pacific, the Zero was used in kamikaze operations. In the course of the war,
more Zeros were built than any other Japanese aircraft.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none"></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/23/airfield-a6m-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dynam PBY Catalina Review</title>
		<link>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/22/dynam-pby-catalina-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/22/dynam-pby-catalina-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RC Airplanes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rcairplanereviews.com/rc-airplane-reviews/174-dynamcatalinareview.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[History


The Consolidated PBY Catalina was an American
flying boat of the 1930s and 1940s produced by Consolidated Aircraft. It was
one of the most widely used multi-role aircraft of World War II. PBYs served
with every branch of the United Stat...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none">History</p>


<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none">The Consolidated PBY Catalina was an American
flying boat of the 1930s and 1940s produced by Consolidated Aircraft. It was
one of the most widely used multi-role aircraft of World War II. PBYs served
with every branch of the United States Armed Forces and in the air forces and
navies of many other nations. In the United States Army Air Forces and later in
the United States Air Force their designation was OA-10. A Canadian-built PBY
would be familiarly called a Canso.</p>


<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none">Swedish Air force Consolidated PBY Catalina on
display at the Swedish Air force museum in Linkoping, Sweden<img src="http://www.rctalks.com/radiocontrol/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/dynam-pby-catalina-review.jpg" mce_src="http://www.rctalks.com/radiocontrol/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/dynam-pby-catalina-review.jpg" style="float: right;" mce_style="float: right;" height="133" width="200"></p>


<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none">During World War II, PBYs were used in
anti-submarine warfare, patrol bombing, convoy escorts, search and rescue
missions (especially air-sea rescue), and cargo transport. The PBY was the most
successful aircraft of its kind; no other flying boat was produced in greater
numbers. The last active military PBYs were not retired from service until the
1980s. Even today, over 70 years after its first flight, the aircraft continues
to fly as an air tanker in aerial firefighting operations all over the world.</p>


<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none">The initialism of "P.B.Y." was
determined in accordance with the U.S. Navy aircraft designation system of
1922; PB representing "Patrol Bomber" and Y being the code used for
the aircraft's manufacturer, Consolidated Aircraft.</p>


<p class="MsoNormal" style="" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none">The Catalina supports a crew of 8 (pilot,
co-pilot, bow turret gunner, flight mechanic, radioman, navigator and two waist
gunners). It is powered by 2-Pratt & Whitney R-1830-92 Twin Wasp radial
engines that produce 1,200hp each and give the plane a maximum speed of 196
mph.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none"></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/22/dynam-pby-catalina-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blitz RC Works A-1 Skyraider Review</title>
		<link>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/21/blitz-rc-works-a-1-skyraider-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/21/blitz-rc-works-a-1-skyraider-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 18:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RC Airplanes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rcairplanereviews.com/rc-airplane-reviews/178-blitzrcworksa-1.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[History


The Douglas A-1
Skyraider (formerly AD) was an American single-seat attack aircraft that saw
service between the late 1940s and early 1980s. It became a piston-powered,
propeller-driven anachronism in the jet age, and was nicknamed
"Sp...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none">History</p>


<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none">The Douglas A-1
Skyraider (formerly AD) was an American single-seat attack aircraft that saw
service between the late 1940s and early 1980s. It became a piston-powered,
propeller-driven anachronism in the jet age, and was nicknamed
"Spad", after a French World War I fighter. ]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/21/blitz-rc-works-a-1-skyraider-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>E-flite Beechcraft Staggerwing Review</title>
		<link>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/20/e-flite-beechcraft-staggerwing-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/20/e-flite-beechcraft-staggerwing-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 18:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RC Airplanes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rcairplanereviews.com/rc-airplane-reviews/175-e-flitestaggerwingreview.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[History
At the height of the Great Depression, aircraft executive Walter H. Beech and
airplane designer T. A. "Ted" Wells joined forces to collaborate on a
project many considered foolhardy — a large, powerful, and fast biplane built
specifically...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal;" mce_style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal;">History<br />
At the height of the Great Depression, aircraft executive Walter H. Beech and
airplane designer T. A. "Ted" Wells joined forces to collaborate on a
project many considered foolhardy — a large, powerful, and fast biplane built
specifically for the business executive. The Beechcraft Model 17, popularly
known as the "Staggerwing" was first flown on November 4, 1932,
setting the standard for private passenger airplanes for many years to come. It
was considered, during its time, to be the premier executive aircraft flying,
much as the Gulfstream executive jets are considered in contemporary times.<img src="http://www.rctalks.com/radiocontrol/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/e-flite-beechcraft-staggerwing-review.jpg" mce_src="http://www.rctalks.com/radiocontrol/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/e-flite-beechcraft-staggerwing-review.jpg" style="float: right;" mce_style="float: right;" height="133" width="200"></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal;" mce_style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal;">The Model 17's unusual negative stagger wing configuration (the upper wing
staggered behind the lower) and unique shape maximized pilot visibility while
minimizing the tendency to stall. The fabric-covered fuselage was faired with
wood formers and stringers over a welded, steel tube frame. Construction was
complex and took many man-hours to complete. The Staggerwing's retractable
conventional landing gear, uncommon at that time, combined with streamlining,
light weight, and powerful radial engines helped it perform significantly
better than other biplane designs.<br />
In the mid-1930s, Beech began a major redesign of the aircraft, to create the
Model D17 Staggerwing. The D17 featured a lengthened fuselage that improved the
aircraft's landing characteristics by increasing the leverage generated by the
elevator. They relocated the Ailerons to the upper wings, eliminating any
interference with the air flow over the flaps. Braking was improved with a
foot-operated brake synchronized to the rudder pedals. These modifications
enhanced the Staggerwing's performance, which was soon put to the test under
wartime conditions.<br />
The Staggerwing held a total of 4 people and 125lbs of baggage. The plane was
powered by a Pratt & Whitney R-985-An-1 radial engine that produces 450 hp
and gave the Staggerwing a top speed of 212 mph. <br />
</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal;" mce_style="margin-bottom: 0.0001pt; line-height: normal;"><br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/20/e-flite-beechcraft-staggerwing-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parkzone RAF SE5a RC Airplane Review</title>
		<link>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/19/parkzone-raf-se5a-rc-airplane-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/19/parkzone-raf-se5a-rc-airplane-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2011 05:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RC Airplanes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rcairplanereviews.com/pzreviews/165-parkzonese5areview.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HistoryThe Royal Aircraft Factory S.E.5 was a British biplane fighter aircraft of the First World War. Although the first examples reached the Western Front before the Sopwith Camel and it had a much better overall performance, problems with its Hispan...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>History</p><p>The Royal Aircraft Factory S.E.5 was a British biplane fighter aircraft of the First World War. Although the first examples reached the Western Front before the Sopwith Camel and it had a much better overall performance, problems with its Hispano-Suiza engine, particularly the geared-output H-S 8B-powered versions, meant that there was a chronic shortage of S.E.5s until well into 1918 and fewer squadrons were equipped with the type than with the Sopwith fighter. Together with the Camel, the S.E.5 was instrumental in regaining allied air superiority in mid-1917 and maintaining this for the rest of the war, ensuring there was no repetition of "Bloody April" 1917 when losses in the Royal Flying Corps were much heavier than in the <img src="http://www.rctalks.com/radiocontrol/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/parkzone-raf-se5a-rc-airplane-review.jpg" mce_src="http://www.rctalks.com/radiocontrol/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/parkzone-raf-se5a-rc-airplane-review.jpg" style="float: right;" mce_style="float: right;" height="133" width="200">Luftstreitkräfte.<br /><br />Only 77 original S.E.5 aircraft were built before production settled on the improved S.E.5a. The S.E.5a differed from late production examples of the S.E.5 only in the type of engine installed - a geared 200 hp Hispano-Suiza 8b, often turning a large clockwise-rotation four-bladed propeller, replacing the 150 hp model. In total 5,265 S.E.5s were built by six manufacturers. A few were converted as two-seat trainers and there were plans for Curtiss to build 1,000 S.E.5s in the United States but only one was completed before the end of the war. At first, airframe construction outstripped the very limited supply of French-built Hispano-Suiza engines and squadrons earmarked to receive the new fighter had to soldier on with Airco DH 5s and Nieuport 24s until early 1918. The troublesome geared "-8b" model of the "Hisso" V8 was prone to have serious gear reduction system problems, sometimes with the propeller (and even the entire gearbox on a very few occasions) separating from the engine and airframe in flight.<br /><br />The introduction of the 200 hp (149 kW) Wolseley Viper, a high-compression, direct drive version of the Hispano-Suiza 8a made under licence by the Wolseley Motor Company, solved the S.E.5a's engine problems and was adopted as the standard powerplant. With the Wolseley under the hood the plane had a top speed of 138 mph a range of 300 miles and a service ceiling ot 17,000 feet. <br /></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/19/parkzone-raf-se5a-rc-airplane-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parkzone Ultra Micro F-27Q Stryker 180 Review</title>
		<link>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/18/parkzone-ultra-micro-f-27q-stryker-180-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/18/parkzone-ultra-micro-f-27q-stryker-180-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 21:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RC Airplanes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rcairplanereviews.com/pzreviews/172-pzumf-27qstrykerreview.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Intro


It was a late Friday afternoon when I went into
RC Hobbies to pick up the new(ish) Parkzone F-27Q Stryker. I had ordered a PnP
version and it had finally come in. I was about to pay for the beastly airplane
when my eyes looked towards the...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none">Intro</p>


<p class="MsoNormal" style="" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none">It was a late Friday afternoon when I went into
RC Hobbies to pick up the new(ish) Parkzone F-27Q Stryker. I had ordered a PnP
version and it had finally come in. I was about to pay for the beastly airplane
when my eyes looked towards the top shelf and noticed a whole row of Ultra
Micro <img src="http://www.rctalks.com/radiocontrol/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/parkzone-ultra-micro-f-27q-stryker-180-review.jpg" mce_src="http://www.rctalks.com/radiocontrol/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/parkzone-ultra-micro-f-27q-stryker-180-review.jpg" style="float: right;" mce_style="float: right;" height="133" width="200">Strykers! Even though I know how to read I blurted out “Are those the new
micro Strykers?!” Indeed they were. I was under the impression they were still
weeks from being released but somehow they were already in stock. I knew I
definitely wanted to review the micro Stryker so I reached even deeper in my
wallet and went home with two Strykers in hand. </p><p class="MsoNormal" style="" mce_style="mso-pagination:none;mso-layout-grid-align:none;
text-autospace:none">]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/18/parkzone-ultra-micro-f-27q-stryker-180-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parkzone Spitfire Mk IX Review</title>
		<link>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/17/parkzone-spitfire-mk-ix-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/17/parkzone-spitfire-mk-ix-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 14:30:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[frontpage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News & Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RC Airplanes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rcairplanereviews.com/pzreviews/176-pzspitfirereview.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HistoryThe Supermarine Spitfire is a British single-seat fighter aircraft which was used by the Royal Air Force and many other Allied countries throughout the Second World War. The Spitfire continued to be used as a front line fighter and in secondary ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>History<br />The Supermarine Spitfire is a British single-seat fighter aircraft which was used by the Royal Air Force and many other Allied countries throughout the Second World War. The Spitfire continued to be used as a front line fighter and in secondary roles into the 1950s. It was produced in greater numbers than any other British aircraft, and was the only British fighter in production throughout the war.<br />The Spitfire was designed as a short-range, high-performance interceptor aircraft by R. J. Mitchell, chief designer at Supermarine Aviation Works. Mitchell continued to refine the design until his death from cancer in 1937, whereupon his colleague Joseph Smith <img src="http://www.rctalks.com/radiocontrol/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/parkzone-spitfire-mk-ix-review.jpg" mce_src="http://www.rctalks.com/radiocontrol/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/parkzone-spitfire-mk-ix-review.jpg" style="float: right;" mce_style="float: right;" height="133" width="200">became chief designer. The Spitfire's elliptical wing had a thin cross-section, allowing a higher top speed than several contemporary fighters, including the Hawker Hurricane. Speed was seen as essential to carry out the mission of home defense against enemy bombers.</p><p>During the Battle of Britain, the Spitfire was perceived by the public as the RAF fighter of the battle, whereas in fact, the more numerous Hurricane actually shouldered a greater proportion of the burden against the Luftwaffe. The Spitfire units did, however, have a lower attrition rate and a higher victory to loss ratio than those flying Hurricanes.</p><p>After the Battle of Britain, the Spitfire became the backbone of RAF Fighter Command, and saw action in the European, Mediterranean, Pacific and the South-East Asian theatres. Much loved by its pilots, the Spitfire served in several roles, including interceptor, photo-reconnaissance, fighter-bomber, carrier-based fighter, and trainer. It was built in many variants, using several wing configurations. Although the original airframe was designed to be powered by a Rolls-Royce Merlin engine producing 1,030 hp (768 kW), it was adaptable enough to use increasingly more powerful Merlin and the later Rolls-Royce Griffon engines; the latter was eventually able to produce 2,035 hp (1,520]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.rctalks.com/2011/11/17/parkzone-spitfire-mk-ix-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- This Quick Cache file was built for (  www.rctalks.com/feed/ ) in 0.77303 seconds, on Feb 23rd, 2012 at 9:14 am UTC. -->
<!-- This Quick Cache file will automatically expire ( and be re-built automatically ) on Feb 23rd, 2012 at 10:14 am UTC -->
<!-- +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ -->
<!-- Quick Cache Is Fully Functional :-) ... A Quick Cache file was just served for (  www.rctalks.com/feed/ ) in 0.00038 seconds, on Feb 23rd, 2012 at 9:23 am UTC. -->
